Beta pilot: direct feedbackProduct intelligence$19 Pro

FeedbackLens

Turn messy feedback into roadmap signals you can defend.

Turn pasted feedback, CSV imports, forwarded messages, and sales notes into themes, duplicates, urgency, and next actions your team can actually discuss.

Built because "users are asking for this" should come with receipts.

DevForge

Product brief

FeedbackLens

Raw messages

"csv import broke again w/ accents..."

Typos, sarcasm, half-context, and messy customer language stay visible.

Confidence

Human review needed when the model is unsure

Low-confidence or ambiguous classifications are marked instead of pretending every label is perfect.

Receipts

Themes link back to every imported message and note

Roadmap meetings get source evidence instead of a single generated summary.

Product signal

Demo feedback is intentionally imperfect; production digests keep raw messages linked to every theme and duplicate cluster.

Interactive demo

Messy feedback triage demo

Review imperfect messages from pasted notes, CSV imports, forwarded email, and sales notes with confidence, duplicates, human-review flags, and a digest people can discuss.

4 inputs reviewed
SourceRaw feedbackThemeConfidenceDuplicate ofSuggested actionReview
CSV importcsv import broke again w/ accents... same as last week :(Import reliability92%BUG-21Link duplicateurgent
EmailNot sure if bug or me but weekly digest never arrivedReporting81%-Investigatereview
Pasted notethis is basically ticket #214, right?Import reliability88%BUG-21Merge threadduplicate
Sales note+1 on SSO. We can't onboard agency clients without it.Team admin76%-Add to roadmapreview
Support notedashboard is nice but i need export before fridayExports69%-Human reviewreview

Duplicate cluster breakdown

Cluster: CSV import fails with accented headers. Inputs include CSV rows, forwarded messages, pasted notes, and support notes. Likely UTF-8 normalization issue during header mapping.

negative spikeduplicate groupAction draft

Weekly feedback digest

  1. Import reliability is the loudest issue this week. 4 reports, 2 duplicates, 1 urgent customer.
  2. Weekly digest requests are increasing. Mostly positive users asking for reporting automation.
  3. SSO is becoming a sales blocker for agencies. Low volume, high revenue impact.
Digest JSON option
{
  "top_theme": "Import reliability",
  "reports": 4,
  "duplicates": 2,
  "human_review": true
}

Duplicate cluster

Duplicate cluster breakdown

Different people rarely describe the same bug the same way. FeedbackLens keeps the raw sources attached to the shared pattern.

Cluster

CSV import fails with accented headers

Inputs

CSV import: accented headers fail Forwarded message: same import bug as ticket 21 Sales note: client file from Mexico breaks on upload Support note: encoding issue with accented names

Detected pattern

Likely UTF-8 normalization issue during header mapping. Suggested action: create one bug ticket, link duplicates, prioritize before next import release.

4 reports2 duplicates1 urgent customerHuman review visible

Workflow

From noisy inbox to roadmap evidence

The workflow preserves raw feedback while clustering repeated themes, showing confidence, and exposing what still needs review.

Theme clustering

Group scattered feedback into product areas without losing the original messages.

Duplicate detection

Link repeated complaints across pasted notes, CSV imports, forwarded messages, and support notes.

Urgency scoring

Separate loud feedback from feedback that blocks revenue or retention.

Digest generation

Send weekly summaries your product team can actually act on.

Human review

Keep low-confidence classifications visible instead of pretending the model is always right.

CSV import and export

CSV import and export is available in the FeedbackLens workflow with plan-aware limits.

Use cases

When feedback sounds loud but needs proof

FeedbackLens is for teams that need to turn scattered messages into defensible roadmap evidence without losing the original wording.

Support teams drowning in repeated bug reports

Founders turning sales calls into product evidence

Product managers preparing roadmap meetings

Developers grouping imported bug reports before a sprint

Agencies collecting client requests across inboxes

Pricing

What each feedback tier actually unlocks

Free handles small feedback batches, Pro adds higher limits and digests, and Team keeps longer history across higher feedback volume. Pro starts at $19/month and Team at $79/month.

Free

Try FeedbackLens with starter limits and no credit card.

Free
$0
  • 100 feedback items/month
  • Manual paste and CSV import
  • 30 days retention
  • Sentiment analysis
  • Spam detection
Start free
Recommended

Pro

For founders and product teams turning feedback into action every week.

Best fit
$19/mo
  • 5,000 feedback items/month
  • Bulk CSV and API import
  • 180 days retention
  • Semantic deduplication
  • Weekly digest
  • Attachment processing
Start Pro

Team

For teams managing higher feedback volume across larger import batches.

Team
$79/mo
  • 25,000 feedback items/month
  • Higher import volume
  • 365 days retention
  • All Pro features included
Start Team

Plan comparison

Feedback limits by source volume

FeatureFreeProTeam
Feedback/month1005,00025,000
CSV importYesBulkBulk
API importNoYesYes
Retention30 days180 days365 days
Semantic dedupeNoYesYes
Weekly digestNoEmailEmail

FAQ

Before you trust a feedback cluster

Can I review or correct classifications?

Yes. FeedbackLens keeps low-confidence items visible so a human can correct themes, urgency, and duplicate links.

Does FeedbackLens show confidence scores?

Yes. Confidence is shown in the triage view so uncertain feedback does not look more precise than it is.

Can it detect duplicates across different imports?

Yes. Pro and Team can link repeated complaints across pasted notes, CSV batches, forwarded messages, and API imports.

Can I export the analyzed feedback?

Yes. The dashboard exports analyzed feedback as CSV, JSON, or XLSX for use in the tools your team already has.

What happens when feedback is ambiguous?

Ambiguous feedback is marked for review instead of being buried inside a confident-looking summary.